JustCode 源码随笔-14

//++中文版++//

面向未来图书管理系统的微观探索 – 00003

未来的图书管理系统,将会重视图书管理员的作用,然而,与传统的图书管理员不同的地方在于,未来的图书管理员可能是超级人工智能,是图书管理系统的核心,负责整个图书馆的运作。同时,与传统图书管理员主要负责书籍管理的工作职责不同,未来的图书管理员,还将成为读者的贴心助手,能够根据读者的需要,帮助读者精确地寻找相应书籍,并帮助制定相应的阅读规划,如果读者需要,可以帮读者提炼书本知识的精华,可以帮助读者解答学术上的难题并引述相关文献同时指引读者找到相关实体书籍,甚至可以和读者谈心,与读者交流读书心得……

同时,由于图书馆主张安静和空间的节约,所以图书馆的布局将十分简约,看起来会像是找不到电子设备的空间。然而,这不意味着和图书管理员的交流会变得困难,因为图书馆的空间是可以任意位置调度全息投影的,同时图书馆是可以读懂读者的脑电波信号的,只要读者同意就行。所以,如果读者想和图书管理员交流,只需要在心里大声地默念“调出图书管理员界面”,那么眼前便会出现一个二维的可调大调小且能任意摆放的界面,如果读者默念“调出图书管理员三维投影”,那么一个美好的人类全息投影形象便会出现在读者的面前,同样可以调大调小任意摆放。同样的,交流过程中读者只能心里默念,不用担心,图书管理员是能通过脑电波信号读懂读者的意思的,图书管理员也全程不会发出任何声音的。

可是,这样的设计,脑电波侦测技术在其中作用强大,读者不会担心自己的心思在图书馆的保密性么?

保密性的担忧确实不能忽视,首先对超级人工智能100%信任是有风险的,同时脑电波的大范围侦测能让读者心里的小心思在人工智能面前暴露得清清楚楚,这也是有风险的。

所以,这套设计方案,作废。同时放弃对未来实体图书馆图书管理系统的幻想,或许对实体图书馆来说,低技术的保密性优势是不可替代的。

所以,面向未来图书管理系统的微观探索,对象最好是永远不联网的电子图书馆,也就是只能活在硬盘里的图书馆,至少,这种探索,顶多只会让一个硬盘报废。

//++English version++//

Microscopic Exploration of Future Library Management System – 00003

The future library management system will place a significant emphasis on the role of librarians. However, unlike traditional librarians, the future librarian may be a super artificial intelligence, serving as the core of the library management system and responsible for the overall operation of the entire library. In addition to the traditional responsibilities of book management, future librarians will also become intimate assistants to readers. They will be able to precisely assist readers in finding relevant books based on their needs, help in devising appropriate reading plans, distill the essence of book knowledge if necessary, assist in solving academic challenges, cite relevant literature, guide readers to find related physical books, and even engage in conversations with readers to exchange thoughts on reading experiences.

Moreover, due to the library’s advocacy for quietness and space conservation, the layout of the library will be minimalistic, resembling a space without electronic devices. However, this does not mean that communication with librarians will become difficult. The library’s space can deploy holographic projections freely, and it can read readers’ brainwave signals, with the reader’s consent. So, if a reader wishes to communicate with the librarian, they only need to mentally chant “summon librarian interface,” and a two-dimensional interface that can be adjusted in size and freely placed will appear. If the reader chants “summon librarian three-dimensional projection,” a beautiful human-like holographic image of the librarian will appear in front of the reader, also adjustable in size and placement. During the communication process, readers can simply think silently, without any worry, as librarians can understand the reader’s intentions through brainwave signals and will not emit any sound throughout the entire process.

However, with this design, the powerful role of brainwave detection technology raises concerns about the confidentiality of readers’ thoughts in the library.

Indeed, concerns about confidentiality cannot be ignored. First, trusting super artificial intelligence 100% carries risks. Additionally, the widespread detection of brainwaves can expose the reader’s thoughts clearly in front of artificial intelligence, posing another risk.

Therefore, this design scheme is discarded. Simultaneously, the fantasy of a future physical library management system is abandoned. Perhaps, for physical libraries, the irreplaceable advantage of low-tech confidentiality should be acknowledged.

Thus, the microscopic exploration of the future library management system is best suited for a perpetually offline electronic library, one that exists only within the confines of a hard drive. At the very least, this exploration will only render one hard drive obsolete.